Econ Papers Daily / 期刊论文
中国跨界流域生态补偿与生态系统服务付费的服务-资金耦合：系统综述与概念框架
Service-fund coupling for ecological compensation and payments for ecosystem services in transboundary watersheds within China: A systematic review and conceptual framework
摘要
Transboundary watersheds within China cross provincial, municipal, regional, and other subnational jurisdictions, separating ecosystem-service providers from beneficiary jurisdictions and creating persistent mismatches among ecological benefits, conservation responsibilities, and funding. This review examines how ecological compensation (EC) and payments for ecosystem services (PES) address these mismatches and develops a service-fund coupling framework. Following PRISMA 2020 reporting principles, it combines bibliometric analysis and metadata-based thematic synthesis of titles, abstracts, and keywords from 1263 studies published during 1995–2025 (823 China National Knowledge Infrastructure; 440 Web of Science) with a purposively stratified full-text audit and qualitative evidence synthesis of 60 studies. The literature has shifted from compensation standards, valuation, and institutional design toward ecosystem service flows, policy attribution, and actor interaction, but ecological, financial, behavioral, and institutional analyses remain weakly integrated. Five gaps persist: biophysical-economic translation, funding-behavior feedback, spatiotemporal mismatch, attribution and adaptive feedback, and equity and institutional constraints. The framework connects ecology-to-funding and funding-to-ecology chains through three interfaces: ecological evidence to payment responsibility, funding arrangements to behavioral additionality, and monitored outcomes to adaptive rule adjustment. It treats temporal lags, uncertainty, power asymmetries, and equity as internal coupling conditions, supporting adaptive, transparent, and accountable governance rather than static transfers. Because the evidence base is weighted toward Chinese-language EC research, the framework applies most directly to transboundary watersheds within China; international transboundary-basin research provides comparative and conceptual reference, and transfer beyond this intranational setting requires separate empirical testing.
中文摘要
中国境内的跨界流域跨越省、市、区域等次国家行政辖区，将生态系统服务提供者与受益辖区分隔开来，造成生态效益、保护责任与资金之间持续存在错配。本综述考察生态补偿（EC）与生态系统服务付费（PES）如何应对这些错配，并构建一个服务—资金耦合框架。遵循PRISMA 2020报告原则，本综述结合文献计量分析与基于元数据的主题综合，分析1995—2025年发表的1263项研究的标题、摘要和关键词（823项来自中国知网；440项来自Web of Science），并对60项研究进行有目的分层全文审查和定性证据综合。文献已从补偿标准、价值评估和制度设计转向生态系统服务流、政策归因和主体互动，但生态、财政、行为和制度分析仍整合不足。持续存在五个缺口：生物物理—经济转化、资金—行为反馈、时空错配、归因与适应性反馈，以及公平与制度约束。该框架通过三个接口连接生态到资金链与资金到生态链：生态证据到支付责任、资金安排到行为额外性、监测结果到适应性规则调整。它将时间滞后、不确定性、权力不对称和公平视为内部耦合条件，支持适应性、透明和可问责的治理，而非静态转移。由于证据基础偏重中文生态补偿研究，该框架最直接适用于中国境内的跨界流域；国际跨界流域研究提供比较和概念参考，超出这一国内情境的迁移需要单独的实证检验。